Acer Predator G5900

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Acer Predator G5900 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator G5900
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20100720
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '19 at 22:38
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 142 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 238 28% 215 Pts	64-Core 255 16% 255 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1812 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Lighting 41 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 39.1 33% 37.5 fps	MRender 39.9 Gravity 40 Splatting 37.7 32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS681 120GB 143 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: AP108PE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 90 37 38 37 38 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39% Below average	Read 189 Write 154 Mixed 142 SusWrite 69.1 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 18.5 84% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 26.4 DQ Write 60.9 DQ Mixed 25.6 25% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 87%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 66GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 51 50 56 53 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 48.3 Write 53.5 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 51.2 38% 50.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.2 53% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 4x2GB 522 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	42.3% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 12.5 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G5900 Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G5900

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	34x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	31x
Core i7 K 875Intel $180Bench 70%, 2,354 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x
GeForce GT 340NvidiaBench 4%, 185 samples	8x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	6x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $44Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $113Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBUnknownBench 36%, 633 samples	9x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,517 samples	5x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $206

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16