Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJan 11 '19 at 10:21
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 863
81% 674 Pts
64-Core 1,372
85% 1,372 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2217 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 74.3
Parallax 60.9
57% 68.2 fps
MRender 73.5
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 70.7
58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 512GB-$283
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 426 434 432 431 432 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 450
Mixed 318
SusWrite 430
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 40.7
146% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 232
209% 317 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 106%
Great: 111%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
689GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 469 471 474 336 332 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 474
Mixed 383
SusWrite 422
96% 423 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 39.3
142% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 165
172% 281 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
459GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 456 459 461 463 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 459
Mixed 440
SusWrite 456
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 51.8
174% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 181
189% 310 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
68GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 235 221 243 273 267 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 475
Write 232
Mixed 253
SusWrite 251
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 24.7
99% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 115
101% 159 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 37
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 31.4
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback