MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7309
MotherboardMSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '19 at 06:31
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 425
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 74
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 85.6
44% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 125
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gigabyte(1458 3505) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 309.8
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 3.69
4% 4.49 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 3.26
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 85 90 94 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 88.9
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 88.6
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HYMP125U64CP8-S6 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB 0h DDR2 856 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309) Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback