Asrock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120608
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 09 '19 at 06:29
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 170
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 311
37% 287 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5970 (Crossfire Disabled)
AMD(1002 2042) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 11
Parallax 18.8
16% 16.3 fps
MRender 9.29
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 15
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2CT040G3 40GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 41 44 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 153
Write 44.7
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 43
17% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 16.7
64% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 36.9
DQ Mixed 52
45% 67.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 37%
Seagate ST310005 24NS 45W 1TB
459GB free
Firmware: BB28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 105 111 109 113 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 109
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 859B CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 Builds (Compare 782 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback