HP EliteBook 850 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 850 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828C
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '19 at 05:48
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 87%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 56.3
54% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 221
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 828C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.47
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 6.47
5% 7.45 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 13.5
8% 9.28 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 1016 1007 1077 1069 1211 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,810
Write 1,259
Mixed 1,394
SusWrite 987
305% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 52.4
162% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 52.5
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 68
62% 90.2 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 188%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
178GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 285 280 296 295 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 411
Write 302
Mixed 337
SusWrite 276
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 36.5
114% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 93.7
96% 158 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 124%
SafeNet HASP HL drive 2GB
2GB free, PID 02f0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.8 6.9 7.7 7.5 7.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Read 18
Write 7.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 6.5
11% 9.38 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC - [0xCD04] F4-2133C15-8GRS 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.8% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 15.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 850 G4 Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback