Apple MacBookPro13,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro13,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-66E35819EE2D0D05
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 08 '19 at 05:17
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 153
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 260
29% 228 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris 550 (Mobile Skylake)
Apple(106B 015D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4483
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 11.9
10% 12.2 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 19.4
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0256 251GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 14.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,361
Write 1508
Mixed 1,431
321% 1,433 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 13.6
46% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 560
DQ Mixed 613
476% 657 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C3531324D3332443250462D3039 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 48
MC Mixed 19.4
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro13,2 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro13,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback