Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '19 at 15:46
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 80.7
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 106
51% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 284
29% 236 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780 4GB
Nvidia(10DE 1111) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 1568 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.2% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 74.2
46% 62.1 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 54.1
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 377 331 226 240 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 372
Write 375
Mixed 336
SusWrite 294
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 29.5
104% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 197
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
102GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 83 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 94.8
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 82.6
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 69%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 7.4 6.9 6.6 6.7 7.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.9
8% 6.95 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback