Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7A65
Motherboard	MSI B250M GAMING PRO (MS-7A65) (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170410
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '19 at 16:50
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 90.5 2-Core 202 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 332 41% 312 Pts	64-Core 364 23% 364 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 92%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 245 432 360 276 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 413 Write 379 Mixed 386 SusWrite 290 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 71.5 4K Mixed 38.6 131% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 359 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$25 16,451 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 466GB free Firmware: CC43 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 202 Write 112 Mixed 80.5 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42 105,447 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 23.5 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 18.5 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	74x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	47x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	44x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157