MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 162%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A95
MotherboardMSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95)  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '19 at 00:46
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,000
97% 798 Pts
64-Core 1,648
102% 1,648 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 100%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 234
Parallax 247
183% 235 fps
MRender 262
Gravity 221
Splatting 141
163% 208 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 161%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Pilot NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$149
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1532 1485 1526 1489 1523 1513 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,449
Write 1,503
Mixed 1,126
SusWrite 1,511
367% 1,647 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 89.7
304% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,216
DQ Write 1,008
DQ Mixed 990
775% 1,071 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 334%
Great: 322%
Mushkin Pilot NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$144
588GB free
Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1678 1671 1682 1666 1689 1649 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,335
Write 1,592
Mixed 1,122
SusWrite 1,672
375% 1,680 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 91.4
304% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,119
DQ Write 1077
DQ Mixed 1,139
844% 1,112 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 339%
Great: 340%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
3TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 178 177 176 178 174 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Toshiba HDWR11A 10TB
9TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 234 232 235 237 232 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 234
Write 206
Mixed 58
SusWrite 233
132% 183 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 134%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 63.3
MC Mixed 31.5
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 11.9
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 108%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95) Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $780
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback