ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 10A6S1LC00

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 10A6S1LC00 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141022
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '19 at 22:11
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 104 2-Core 205 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 392 52% 392 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT 12,718 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 82D4) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2.17 2% 2.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 81 79 74 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 130 Write 100 Mixed 122 SusWrite 77.8 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 91.5 4K Mixed 26.8 113% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 99.8 79% 110 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 73%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 294GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 102 104 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 103 69% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HU564404EP0200 0215 CM3X2G1333C9 0707 HU564404EP0200 0215 CM3X2G1333C9 12GB 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.4% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 16.8 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback