Asus P5Q

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '19 at 20:37
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5450-$299 5,870 User benchmarks, average bench 50% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Memory 72.9 1-Core 51.5 2-Core 104 48% 76.1 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 204 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(0000 0000) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	5.11% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 6.81 Parallax 2.22 6% 5.31 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 5.17 Splatting 4.35 4% 5.14 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.11% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM22.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 236 246 249 250 250 MB/s Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67% Good	Read 259 Write 250 Mixed 215 SusWrite 229 54% 238 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 60.6 4K Mixed 32 112% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 102 97% 153 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 102%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 30GB free Firmware: CT100-13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 52 52 52 52 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 66.9 Write 55.6 Mixed 40 SusWrite 48.9 39% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 42%
ASMT 2115 512GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 374GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 34.7 Write 29.4 Mixed 31.3 SusWrite 27.9 41% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 7.8 560% 7.8 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 213%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 94.9 42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	75x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	56x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	38x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	23x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	21x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	10x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	194x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	90x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16