Asus G56JK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G56JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G56JK
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140513
Uptime15.3 Days
Run DateJan 05 '19 at 19:35
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 192
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 518
55% 437 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Asus(1043 22CA) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9065
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 17.1
17% 18.1 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 15.6
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
681GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 109 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 105
66% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.M16 Kingston ASU16D3LS1KFG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G56JK Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G56JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback