Samsung QX310/QX410/QX510/SF310/SF410/SF510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung QX310/QX410/QX510/SF310/SF410/SF510  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG QX310/QX410/QX510/SF310/SF410/SF510
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '19 at 12:09
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 480
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 49.7
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 85.8
37% 60.6 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 142
20% 144 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C08B) 1.8GB
Driver: Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 203 213 186 194 164 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.4% Average
Read 224
Write 213
Mixed 198
SusWrite 190
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 19.9
63% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 151
122% 171 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 8.4
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QX310/QX410/QX510/SF310/SF410/SF510 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung QX310/QX410/QX510/SF310/SF410/SF510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Very poor Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback