Medionpc MS-7502

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedionpc MS-7502  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7502
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100113
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 05 '19 at 09:36
Run Duration346 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 76.2
39% 59.6 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 148
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
MSI(1462 809F) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 1.19
2% 2.12 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 1.87
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 218 207 214 210 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.8% Good
Read 256
Write 246
Mixed 228
SusWrite 213
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 37.3
122% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 191
143% 190 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 124%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
446GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 85.9
Write 88.9
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 93.5
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
20GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 85 78 76 72 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 83.2
Write 78.6
Mixed 71
SusWrite 81.8
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDT725050VLAT80 500GB
466GB free, PID 0274
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 1 1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.9
1% 0.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7502 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7502

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback