Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '15 at 05:45
Run Duration360 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$183
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.9 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 167
55% 122 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 594
54% 455 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 55% Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 54.3
32% 41.3 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 37.8
30% 35.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 473
Write 189
Mixed 228
65% 297 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 22.5
126% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 63.5
87% 161 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 87%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
34GB free
Firmware: 1AC0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 65
Write 119
Mixed 79.8
66% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.75
4K Mixed 0.53
133% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 2038
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Read 13.6
Write 3.52
Mixed 5.01
8% 7.39 MB/s
4K Read 5.63
4K Write 0.05
4K Mixed 0.06
25% 1.91 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 4%
Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback