Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180205
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '19 at 22:04
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 204
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 574
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 37.3
32% 35.6 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 36.2
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tcsunbow M3 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 136 137 138 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 402
Mixed 396
SusWrite 164
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 48.3
167% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 98.5
137% 251 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 96%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
993GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 174 175 175 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 164
Mixed 31
SusWrite 174
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
152GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 119 119 120 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 157
Write 110
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 118
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
47GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 91 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 81.8
Write 84.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 89.7
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-4GNS 0420 F3-1600C11-8GNT 0420 F3-1600C11-4GNS 0420 F3-1600C11-8GNT 24GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback