HP 500-102eo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP 500-102eo  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime18.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 18:24
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 128
59% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 222
27% 207 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D + 7000 Dual Graphics
MSI(1462 B498) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Lighting 7.67
Reflection 8.46
Parallax 7.59
6% 7.91 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 6.73
Splatting 8.7
6% 6.92 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.12%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
496GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 73 105 134 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 14
Write 96.7
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 97.8
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.9% Poor
MC Read 14
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-102eo Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 500-102eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback