Motherboard Z68ITX-A-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMotherboard Z68ITX-A-E  (all builds)
MotherboardZOTAC Z68ITX-A-E
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 17:45
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 215
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 554
55% 450 Pts
64-Core 557
34% 557 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB
CLim: 1337 MHz, MLim: 1687 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 35.1
Parallax 46.5
32% 40.2 fps
MRender 51.7
Gravity 46.8
Splatting 37
36% 45.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 204 178 174 157 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.9% Good
Read 259
Write 248
Mixed 233
SusWrite 175
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 35.6
115% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1333 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68ITX-A-E Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Motherboard Z68ITX-A-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $790
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback