Toshiba SATELLITE Radius 11 L10W-C-10C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE Radius 11 L10W-C-10C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF40 0672
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150831
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 14:12
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3050
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Memory 37.2
1-Core 14
2-Core 25.6
18% 25.6 Pts
4-Core 28.1
8-Core 35.1
4% 31.6 Pts
64-Core 39.9
2% 39.9 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Toshiba(1179 FBC8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 2.41
2% 2.65 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 0.09
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 70 59 71 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 51.7
Write 79.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 68.2
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 58%
Freecom ToughDrive 128GB
4GB free, PID fc9b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 37 38 37 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
Read 38.2
Write 29.5
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 37.8
48% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 7
690% 9.13 MB/s
DQ Read 12.1
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 9.2
987% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
65535, 65535 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 216
18% 216 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE Radius 11 L10W-C-10C Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE Radius 11 L10W-C-10C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback