Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Memory 56.5 1-Core 20.5 2-Core 40.7 28% 39.2 Pts	4-Core 40.8 8-Core 40.9 5% 40.8 Pts	64-Core 41 2% 41 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3577) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.98% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.58 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.42 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.98% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: GR2O Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 592 Write 15.3 Mixed 27.7 152% 212 MB/s	4K Read 94.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 4,105% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Elpida EBJ20UF8BCS0-DJ-F 4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 5.6 13% 4.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	11x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	8x
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	1x

SSD
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	1x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $125

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16