Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming K5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming K5  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren, , 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime12.4 Days
Run DateJan 02 '19 at 22:09
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$233
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 298
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 813
82% 663 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.77% Terrible
Lighting 8.13
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 8.16
7% 9.39 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 16.2
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
MSI(1462 2831) 2GB
CLim: 1272 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 29% Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 506 521 511 494 510 504 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,998
Write 1043
Mixed 642
SusWrite 508
231% 1,048 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 59.3
232% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,201
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 451
413% 659 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 216%
Great: 283%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
271GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 168 165 164 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 166
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 165
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
15GB free
Firmware: 21.12M22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 35.5
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 63.9
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 59%
ST250LT0 03-9YG14C 250GB
233GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 35.3
Mixed 24
SusWrite 36.7
45% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 27.4
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 25.9
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming K5 Builds (Compare 1,120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming K5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback