Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '19 at 07:46
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 127
56% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 208
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3.88
Parallax 4.22
2% 3.52 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 282 304 306 305 308 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 376
Write 304
Mixed 234
SusWrite 300
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 22.6
81% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 147
128% 191 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 98%
Toshiba Q300 Pro 256GB-$149
115GB free
Firmware: JURA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 372 370 389 393 393 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 404
Write 326
Mixed 379
SusWrite 378
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 31.1
96% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 250
185% 245 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 102%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 507GB
397GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 10242398 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback