Lenovo 90AY000HUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90AY000HUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Bantry CRB
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150630
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 01 '19 at 21:41
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-770K (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 117
49% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 176
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 360
MSI(1462 3271) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 24
15% 23.6 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 30.4
20% 23.7 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 417 414 405 317 282 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 448
Write 412
Mixed 331
SusWrite 370
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 33.5
131% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 200
152% 205 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
538GB free
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 153 148 152 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 126
Write 181
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 152
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G16002 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB PSD34G16002 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 12.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90AY000HUS Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90AY000HUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback