Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	73.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8559U 2,379 User benchmarks, average bench 78% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 167 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 321 38% 296 Pts	64-Core 563 35% 563 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.6% Very good	Lighting 91.6 Reflection 102 Parallax 87.3 75% 93.7 fps	MRender 89.3 Gravity 83.4 Splatting 88.6 71% 87.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 88%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 8,316 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Intel(8086 2074) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6287 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Lighting 11.4 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 11.6 9% 11.5 fps	MRender 13.7 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 18.1 12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,525 Write 3670 Mixed 3,841 893% 4,012 MB/s	4K Read 306 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 162 751% 206 MB/s	DQ Read 820 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 561 422% 577 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 362GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1984 2011 2008 1986 2014 2011 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	288% Outstanding	Read 1,882 Write 1,653 Mixed 1,124 SusWrite 2,002 375% 1,665 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 97.1 4K Mixed 53.3 179% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,030 DQ Write 527 DQ Mixed 680 532% 746 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 288% Great: 393%
Ct1000mx 50 1TB 2,171 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 759GB free Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 300 300 297 292 292 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 365 Write 321 Mixed 319 SusWrite 297 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 24.7 4K Mixed 18.2 65% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 74.6 DQ Write 69.9 DQ Mixed 79 57% 74.5 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 2x8GB 886 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 40 MC Write 50.6 MC Mixed 26.5 112% 39 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 35.4 SC Mixed 18 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris Plus Graphics 655IntelBench 9%, 8,316 samples	1,607x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	75x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	48x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	47x

RAM
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 5,229 samples	61x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 5,327 samples	54x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	35x

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $43

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16