Packard EasyNote MH36

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Packard EasyNote MH36 (all builds)
Motherboard	PACKARD PE2L
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090408
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '19 at 11:44
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4200-$99 5,474 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	28% Poor	Memory 48 1-Core 25.9 2-Core 46.5 27% 40.1 Pts	4-Core 48.4 8-Core 53.2 7% 50.8 Pts	64-Core 51.6 3% 51.6 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(1631 018B) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1892 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.3% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.37 fps	MRender 0.24 Gravity 0.13 Splatting 0.48 0% 0.28 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.3% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 145 162 162 153 133 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.2% Below average	Read 170 Write 158 Mixed 175 SusWrite 151 37% 163 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 18.3 54% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.5 DQ Write 53.3 DQ Mixed 39 30% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 123%
Philips USB Flash Drive 8GB 161 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 6GB free, PID 3e00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4 4 3.9 3.8 3.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	2.9% Terrible	Read 11.2 Write 0.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 3.7 5% 4.47 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.9% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.5 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote MH36 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote MH36

CPU
Core2 Duo T9300Intel $70Bench 38%, 3,287 samples	1x
Pentium T4300IntelBench 34%, 6,462 samples	1x
Pentium T4200Intel $99Bench 34%, 5,474 samples	1x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	6x

SSD
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x
LCH-256V2S-HP 256GBLiteonBench 75%, 1,560 samples	1x
Vertex 4 128GBOCZ $215Bench 88%, 19,372 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 29% - Poor

Total price: $155

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16