ECS A780LM-M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardECS A780LM-M2  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '19 at 05:15
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 455-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 94.9
47% 72.9 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 144
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500
PwrHis(1787 2314) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 3.87
3% 4.22 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 3.53
Splatting 4.04
3% 3.62 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 72 39 71 71 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49% Average
Read 104
Write 100
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 66.8
58% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5773SB0-CK0 6GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A780LM-M2 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A780LM-M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback