PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M2N (all builds) |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 9 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090216 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 31 '18 at 23:32 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
|
43.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
|
30.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 EVO 250GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 94 101 102 102 MB/s
|
36%
Below average
|
|||
48.5%
Average
|
||||
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
63GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 67 68 69 70 71 MB/s
|
40.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 9GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
15.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples | 8x |
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+AMDBench 37%, 5,400 samples | 5x |
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+AMDBench 35%, 4,133 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples | 3x |
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 2x |
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |