HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3029h
Memory2.4 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080409
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '18 at 14:17
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Dual Core 4450B-$21
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 33.9
2-Core 66.8
38% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 67
8-Core 67.4
9% 67.2 Pts
64-Core 68.3
4% 68.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3100 Graphics
HP(103C 3029) 256MB
Driver: atidxx32.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.58 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.61
0% 0.41 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.34%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AHC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 31 30 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 84
Write 72.4
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 30.3
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 54%
0GB free, PID 2036
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Read 16
Write 3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.8
6% 6.32 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 37GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback