Lenovo 10120

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10120  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 31 '18 at 04:39
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 550
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT LDS-256L9S 256GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HD86201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 400 394 382 402 371 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 381
Mixed 284
SusWrite 387
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 34.5
122% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 157
141% 213 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 92%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
116GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 309 310 310 306 238 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 467
Mixed 446
SusWrite 317
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 58.5
199% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 117%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$34
883GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 104 103 103 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 97.8
Mixed 55
SusWrite 102
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB M378B5173QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10120 Builds (Compare 384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback