Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S935

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 81% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S935 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB284
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180305
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '18 at 21:06
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	13%
CPU Throttled	81%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5200U 107,407 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 66 1-Core 43.5 2-Core 79.6 41% 63 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 108 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 87.9 5% 87.9 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Fujitsu(10CF 1896) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.41% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 3.96 Parallax 3.09 2% 3.14 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 5.26 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.41% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-00000 128GB 601 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 153 155 155 155 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 429 Write 158 Mixed 186 SusWrite 153 51% 232 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 66.7 4K Mixed 31.7 119% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 154 144% 230 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB 304 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.6% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 14.9 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical LIFEBOOK S935 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S935

CPU
Core i7-5600UIntelBench 50%, 20,423 samples	19x
Core i5-5300UIntelBench 42%, 29,898 samples	9x
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	8x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	37x

SSD
MZ7LN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 1,578 samples	4x
MZ7TE256HMHP-00007 256GBSamsungBench 73%, 88 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x

RAM
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBMicronBench 50%, 304 samples	10x
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GBMicronBench 49%, 304 samples	8x
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 12GBMicronBench 41%, 137 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16