Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100810
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '18 at 02:16
Run Duration	451 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 157 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 341 38% 300 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.1% Below average	Lighting 40.1 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 42.2 33% 37.9 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 36.8 31% 38 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team L3 EVO SSD 240GB 421 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 90 74 63 39 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45% Average	Read 220 Write 210 Mixed 189 SusWrite 77.8 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 26.2 94% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 29.1 DQ Write 80.6 DQ Mixed 29.4 30% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 89%
Seagate ST3160022ACE 160GB 202 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 136GB free Firmware: .915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 25.3 Write 9.5 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 15.3 12% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 26%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 882GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 50 48 50 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	45% Average	Read 104 Write 104 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 52.6 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 74%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 91 77 73 42 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	64% Good	Read 142 Write 145 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 81.1 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 84%
Fujitsu MHZ2120BH G2 120GB 468 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 80GB free Firmware: 8909 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 49 50 48 50 50 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 49.8 Write 46.3 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 48.7 33% 44.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 31%
Samsung SP1604N 160GB-$43 320 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 148GB free Firmware: MT01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 28 Write 29.3 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 15.3 17% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 32%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 882GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 28 28 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.8% Very poor	Read 30 Write 27.5 Mixed 25 SusWrite 28.4 38% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 1024, 4096, 1024, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	40.3% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.5 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-USB3 Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	143x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	86x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	21x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	18x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	95x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	68x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $249

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16