Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151105
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '18 at 20:12
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 119
56% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 354
38% 301 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 1962) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 45.8
Reflection 45
Parallax 40.1
37% 43.7 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 41
Splatting 36.3
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 380 399 375 443 360 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 480
Write 439
Mixed 338
SusWrite 383
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 29.2
108% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 159
144% 219 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
495GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 138 140 140 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 152
Write 132
Mixed 80
SusWrite 138
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ4GX3M1A160 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ 12GB
667, 800 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.6
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FX-GAMING Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback