Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 116% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 529 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 60.1 1-Core 105 2-Core 207 67% 124 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 796 70% 594 Pts	64-Core 2,153 133% 2,153 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Lighting 178 Reflection 189 Parallax 197 145% 188 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 182 Splatting 129 118% 146 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 613GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 799 1989 1858 1155 1152 1150 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	287% Outstanding	Read 2,355 Write 1,941 Mixed 1,387 SusWrite 1,350 393% 1,758 MB/s	4K Read 56.1 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 77.4 254% 88.1 MB/s	DQ Read 804 DQ Write 577 DQ Mixed 675 508% 685 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 287% Great: 372%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$70 2,931 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 477GB free Firmware: 57CZ Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1158 1425 1489 1496 1493 1492 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	222% Outstanding	Read 1179 Write 1,022 Mixed 908 SusWrite 1,425 256% 1,134 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 42.2 176% 69.2 MB/s	DQ Read 925 DQ Write 622 DQ Mixed 673 529% 740 MB/s
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 222% Great: 242%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 7.5TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 7TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 83 77 72 75 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 370 Write 31.8 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 73.8 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 212% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 164%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x16GB 2,632 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 48.4 MC Write 35.9 MC Mixed 41.2 120% 41.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 19.9 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 127 31% 127 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 142%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 102%

UFO

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GBIntel $550Bench 186%, 8,641 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	21x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 8x8GBMicronBench 92%, 150 samples	12x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	11x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $643

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16