Gigabyte H310M A

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte H310M A
Motherboard	Gigabyte H310M A (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180302
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '18 at 14:43
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139 23,493 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 76.7 1-Core 83 2-Core 135 60% 98.2 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 232 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6154) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 25.6 Parallax 34.9 28% 31.6 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 32.2 28% 34 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 197 115 87 83 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 400 Write 375 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 136 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 52.7 4K Mixed 25 92% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 130 138% 230 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBD2 1x8GB 2,010 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	42% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M A-CF Builds (Compare 706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte H310M A - $80

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	206x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	154x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	75x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	50x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	53x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	25x
9905702-137.A00G 859B CT8G4DFD824A.C16FF 16GBKingstonBench 77%, 38 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $339

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16