Asrock Z170 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z170 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180123
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 29 '18 at 12:13
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 226
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 633
64% 521 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Lighting 97.9
Reflection 88.3
Parallax 140
80% 109 fps
MRender 87.1
Gravity 103
Splatting 124
88% 105 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 117 162 182 441 332 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 867
Write 559
Mixed 648
SusWrite 273
131% 587 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 48.3
178% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 476
370% 506 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 129%
Great: 144%
Intel 535 Series 240GB-$200
223GB free
Firmware: RG21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 134 88 111 52 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 400
Write 252
Mixed 282
SusWrite 125
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 44.3
159% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 164
150% 231 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 95%
ST332062 0AS 320GB
1GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 43.3
Write 26.7
Mixed 33
42% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 31%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA600 6TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 90 83 85 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 146
Write 146
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 85.4
144% 111 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
159% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 80%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
5GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 89 83 85 87 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 59.8
Write 73.3
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 84.6
108% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 0.8
393% 4.03 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 1
426% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$170
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 23.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 25.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 Pro4 Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Pro4 - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $466
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback