Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9750 1,906 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket 940, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 39.7 2-Core 79.9 43% 64.4 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 164 20% 155 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450 15,395 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Zotac(19DA 1203) 1.5GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Lighting 23.3 Reflection 39.2 Parallax 19.6 19% 27.4 fps	MRender 31.2 Gravity 11.6 Splatting 26.8 19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 59 69 73 73 73 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.7% Below average	Read 245 Write 40.3 Mixed 104 SusWrite 64.7 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 13 52% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 98 DQ Write 40.3 DQ Mixed 40.4 38% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 55%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 26GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 3.9 4.5 5.3 4.2 5.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	6.5% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 2.8 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 4.7 12% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.4 80% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.5% Great: 18%
Mass Storage Device 1TB 3,987 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 332GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 24.8 Write 23.3 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 16.8 29% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 10.2 25% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 6.8 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 93 43% 93 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom 8450e Triple-CoreAMDBench 38%, 118 samples	2x
Athlon II X2 220AMDBench 39%, 5,045 samples	2x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	2x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5500AMDBench 3%, 5,613 samples	2x

SSD
SSD 120GBLonglineBench 65%, 271 samples	1x
SF-SSD-120-PCB-RIN 120GBBench 65%, 7 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16