Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 93.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 224 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 600 64% 510 Pts	64-Core 592 37% 592 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 340.52 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	3.92% Terrible	Lighting 4.93 Reflection 5.54 Parallax 3.72 4% 4.73 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 3.22 4% 4.76 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.92% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 206 28 33 124 24 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.9% Below average	Read 261 Write 95.8 Mixed 84.1 SusWrite 102 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 10.5 45% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 14.5 DQ Write 15.7 DQ Mixed 14.4 11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 621GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 89 90 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 112 Write 54 Mixed 58 SusWrite 88.8 58% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.CAGG0.AUK0C 0112 78.CAGG0.DFK0C 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.9% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 17.2 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 20.9 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	21x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	13x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	12x

RAM
9905471-074.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 54%, 1,544 samples	11x
GY1600D364L10/8G 0793 GR1333D364L9S/4G 12GBUnknownBench 43%, 9 samples	5x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	5x

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $309