Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170818
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 28 '18 at 16:15
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 199
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 542
58% 463 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 116
Parallax 108
87% 110 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 102
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 198 201 202 202 202 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 464
Mixed 428
SusWrite 218
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 50.2
172% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 38.3
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 76.5
95% 156 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
58GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 99 100 99 102 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 57
Mixed 31
SusWrite 96.7
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.4
170% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB
24GB free
Firmware: JC4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 86 75 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 94
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 80.4
59% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 64%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
30GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 102 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 95
Write 97
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 102
58% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
69GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 138 131 135 115 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 126
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 129
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB
204GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17% Very poor
Read 37
Write 38
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 38.6
49% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99[2/7/4]199[F/T] Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.3% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 24.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 22
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback