Acer Nitro AN515-42

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-42  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Freed_RRS
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181030
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 28 '18 at 02:28
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 66.6
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 162
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 472
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560X
Acer(1025 125D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
25% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 35.4
26% 32.5 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 29.2
Splatting 29.8
24% 28.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,965
Write 4,716
Mixed 4,948
1,159% 5,209 MB/s
4K Read 375
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 204
925% 253 MB/s
DQ Read 1,011
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 699
555% 783 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
640GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 110 108 109 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 130
Write 100
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 109
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
142% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Kingston 9905624-051.A00G 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 27.1
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 20.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-42 Builds (Compare 866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback