Asus P8H61-M2/C/SI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M2/C/SI  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '16 at 01:27
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 194
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 379
50% 375 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Gigabyte(1458 3559) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 38.5
27% 34 fps
MRender 41
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 25.6
25% 32 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 372
Write 368
Mixed 374
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 13.9
71% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 13.8
60% 136 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
217GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 140
Write 89.6
Mixed 137
93% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.15
63% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991769 (996769) 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M2/C/SI Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M2/C/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback