User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
Systemempty empty
MotherboardTYAN TYAN-Tempest-i5000PW-S5382
Memory3.9 GB free of 10 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20061024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '18 at 22:17
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5345
LGA771, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Memory 42.2
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 52.2
26% 40.4 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 93.2
13% 97.6 Pts
64-Core 95.1
6% 95.1 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 5600
Nvidia(10DE 0409) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 6.62
Parallax 2.88
5% 5.19 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 4.74
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MMCRE28G5MXP-0VB 128GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM1801Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 8.6 10 19 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 49.6
Write 16
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 16.4
15% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 3.3
695% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10x1GB
10 of 16 slots used
10GB DIMM DDR2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.27% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.4
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.27%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback