HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP ENVY 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1968
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160722
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateDec 27 '18 at 11:56
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 441
48% 379 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
HP(103C 21A1) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 9.88
Parallax 10.7
11% 11.4 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 8.57
8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0422C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 72 82 79 79 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 470
Write 423
Mixed 378
SusWrite 109
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 35.8
94% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 228
192% 277 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
649GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 92 92 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 90
Write 87.5
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 91.8
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback