Asus X99-A II

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A II (all builds)
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '18 at 05:30
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 91.7 1-Core 118 2-Core 217 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 730 74% 599 Pts	64-Core 908 56% 908 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 113 Parallax 105 86% 108 fps	MRender 97.4 Gravity 95.9 Splatting 99.7 80% 97.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 86GB free Firmware: 8EV10135 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 275 275 327 249 277 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 339 Write 335 Mixed 309 SusWrite 281 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 95.8 4K Mixed 45.5 162% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 515 346% 418 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 230%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1048 1013 1026 911 325 313 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 2090 Write 1,264 Mixed 859 SusWrite 773 276% 1,246 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 65.7 213% 76.3 MB/s	DQ Read 875 DQ Write 641 DQ Mixed 782 578% 766 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 363%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 86GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 101 110 101 99 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 108 Write 87.3 Mixed 64.3 SusWrite 103 67% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 66%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 725GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 126 143 120 124 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	74% Very good	Read 130 Write 113 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 128 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 122 104 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 144 Write 111 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 110 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 106 118 100 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 114 Write 77.8 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 106 70% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 99%
ST3000DM 007-1WY10G 3TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 99 116 92 95 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.7% Average	Read 136 Write 153 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 100 157% 117 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 55% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 47%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 99 116 92 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 120 Write 130 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 100 146% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G 4x8GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	MC Read 37.2 MC Write 44.6 MC Mixed 34.1 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 18.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	706x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	197x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	193x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	182x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	111x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	64x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	41x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	29x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $686

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16