Gigabyte GA-H170-D3HP-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H170-D3HP
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H170-D3HP-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160307
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '18 at 21:03
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 103 2-Core 214 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 351 39% 309 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% PowerColor(148C 2358) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Lighting 64 Reflection 57 Parallax 85.1 52% 68.7 fps	MRender 59 Gravity 56.3 Splatting 75.3 53% 63.5 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 446 Write 403 Mixed 339 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 49.2 153% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 358 267% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 241GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 140 Write 140 Mixed 91.5 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 143 Write 145 Mixed 73.7 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 2x8GB 4,057 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	60.7% Good	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 19.8 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 16.8 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H170-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-D3HP-CF

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	84x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	82x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	41x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	26x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
MX200 250GBCrucial $134Bench 95%, 26,364 samples	12x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	17x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $41Bench 68%, 16,658 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $537

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16