Asrock X99X Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '18 at 21:02
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 660
65% 532 Pts
64-Core 823
51% 823 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 209
Parallax 194
122% 184 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 184
Splatting 122
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 806 571 561 460 404 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,031
Write 905
Mixed 609
SusWrite 617
177% 791 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 53.4
257% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,266
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 953
739% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 202%
Great: 230%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
159GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 450 446 456 445 442 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 459
Mixed 317
SusWrite 452
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 42.8
156% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 152
164% 272 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 116%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
146GB free
Firmware: MX4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 126 117 137 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 175
Write 178
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 119
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2800 2OZ 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 38.1
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.4
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 100%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $559
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback