MSI Z77A-G41 (MS-7758)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7758
MotherboardMSI Z77A-G41 (MS-7758)  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 26 '18 at 11:46
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 179
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 513
49% 406 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.5% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 72.1
47% 64.2 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 55.6
Splatting 52.6
46% 57 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 479
Write 457
Mixed 362
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 41.6
155% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 354
269% 362 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
449GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 131 129 131 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 109
Write 84
Mixed 68
SusWrite 131
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 8502 PSD32G13332 8502 PSD32G13332 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77A-G41 (MS-7758) Builds (Compare 719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-G41 (MS-7758) - $232

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback