Biostar TZ77XE4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TZ77XE4  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120822
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 04 '16 at 18:29
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 490
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 3962) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 45
Parallax 40.4
40% 44.9 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 37.1
32% 39 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
154GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 83.2
Write 80.3
Mixed 4.84
40% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 0.19
47% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 67%
WD WD10 00JB-00CRA1 100GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 34.1
Mixed 32.9
25% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.35
81% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. 04CB DDR3 1600 859B BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. 04CB DDR3 1600 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TZ77XE4 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar TZ77XE4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback