Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '18 at 00:47
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 242
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 1,082
96% 814 Pts
64-Core 1,790
111% 1,790 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 180
Parallax 187
137% 178 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 159
Splatting 116
106% 130 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 808 443 421 442 477 480 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,804
Write 921
Mixed 731
SusWrite 512
219% 992 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 46.9
172% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 379
342% 536 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 184%
Great: 243%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
2TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 41 41 42 41 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 74%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 44 43 45 46 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 320%
Verbatim Store n Go Drive 4GB
4GB free, PID 0238
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.8 4.9 4.5 4.5 4.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.61% Terrible
Read 35.5
Write 4.7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 4.7
12% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.61%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown + 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 53
MC Write 56.3
MC Mixed 47.6
149% 52.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 19
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 131%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $619
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback