Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '18 at 21:33
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 208
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 600
57% 473 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: Press
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 39.1
28% 35.2 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 36.4
28% 33.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LDLC 480GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 26 2.1 70 3.1 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 496
Write 437
Mixed 415
SusWrite 90.7
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 1
46% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 16
38% 86.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 196%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
338GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 94 93 93 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 91.6
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 92.6
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 88%
Maxtor STM3160815AS 160GB
55GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 42 46 41 45 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 58
Write 60
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 41.8
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown? CMV8GX4M1A2400C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback