Lenovo ThinkServer TS140

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo ThinkServer TS140  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO ThinkServer TS140
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160624
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 23 '18 at 23:31
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3-$256
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 397
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P4600
Legend(17AA 30A5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 6.97
3% 5.93 fps
MRender 9.67
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.09
6% 6.74 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 377 375 384 385 385 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 372
Write 368
Mixed 203
SusWrite 380
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 49.6
167% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 220
200% 306 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 106%
Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
97GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 93.4
Write 80.6
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 93.5
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 88%
Wd1003fbyx-88 LEN 1TB
862GB free
Firmware: WB33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 125 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 123
Write 120
Mixed 106
SusWrite 125
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 78%
Mass Storage Device 64GB
60GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 17 18 17 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Read 20
Write 15.2
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 16.8
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
47% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 19%
Mass Storage Device 64GB
60GB free, PID 1211
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 17 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
7.71% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 16.2
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 17
22% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
27% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.71%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U7BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ThinkServer TS140 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo ThinkServer TS140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback